In mathematics, a group action of a group on a set is a group homomorphism from to some group (under function composition) of functions from to itself. It is said that acts on .
Many sets of transformations form a group under function composition; for example, the rotations around a point in the plane. It is often useful to consider the group as an abstract group, and to say that one has a group action of the abstract group that consists of performing the transformations of the group of transformations. The reason for distinguishing the group from the transformations is that, generally, a group of transformations of a structure acts also on various related structures; for example, the above rotation group also acts on triangles by transforming triangles into triangles.
If a group acts on a structure, it will usually also act on objects built from that structure. For example, the group of Euclidean isometries acts on Euclidean space and also on the figures drawn in it; in particular, it acts on the set of all . Similarly, the group of symmetries of a polyhedron acts on the vertices, the edges, and the faces of the polyhedron.
A group action on a vector space is called a representation of the group. In the case of a finite-dimensional vector space, it allows one to identify many groups with subgroups of the general linear group , the group of the invertible matrices of dimension over a field .
The symmetric group acts on any set with elements by permuting the elements of the set. Although the group of all of a set depends formally on the set, the concept of group action allows one to consider a single group for studying the permutations of all sets with the same cardinality.
Identity: | |
Compatibility: |
The group is then said to act on (from the left). A set together with an action of is called a ( left) - set.
It can be notationally convenient to currying the action , so that, instead, one has a collection of transformations , with one transformation for each group element . The identity and compatibility relations then read
With the above understanding, it is very common to avoid writing entirely, and to replace it with either a dot, or with nothing at all. Thus, can be shortened to or , especially when the action is clear from context. The axioms are then
From these two axioms, it follows that for any fixed in , the function from to itself which maps to is a bijection, with inverse bijection the corresponding map for . Therefore, one may equivalently define a group action of on as a group homomorphism from into the symmetric group of all bijections from to itself.This is done, for example, by
Identity: | |
>Compatibility: |
Identity: | |
>Compatibility: |
for all and in and all in .
The difference between left and right actions is in the order in which a product acts on . For a left action, acts first, followed by second. For a right action, acts first, followed by second. Because of the formula , a left action can be constructed from a right action by composing with the inverse operation of the group. Also, a right action of a group on can be considered as a left action of its opposite group on .
Thus, for establishing general properties of group actions, it suffices to consider only left actions. However, there are cases where this is not possible. For example, the multiplication of a group induces both a left action and a right action on the group itself—multiplication on the left and on the right, respectively.
The action is called (or semiregular or fixed-point free) if the statement that for some already implies that . In other words, no non-trivial element of fixes a point of . This is a much stronger property than faithfulness.
For example, the action of any group on itself by left multiplication is free. This observation implies Cayley's theorem that any group can be Embedding in a symmetric group (which is infinite when the group is). A finite group may act faithfully on a set of size much smaller than its cardinality (however such an action cannot be free). For instance the abelian 2-group (of cardinality ) acts faithfully on a set of size . This is not always the case, for example the cyclic group cannot act faithfully on a set of size less than .
In general the smallest set on which a faithful action can be defined can vary greatly for groups of the same size. For example, three groups of size 120 are the symmetric group , the icosahedral group and the cyclic group . The smallest sets on which faithful actions can be defined for these groups are of size 5, 7, and 16 respectively.
The action is (or sharply transitive, or ) if it is both transitive and free. This means that given there is exactly one such that . If is acted upon simply transitively by a group then it is called a principal homogeneous space for or a -torsor.
For an integer , the action is if has at least elements, and for any pair of -tuples with pairwise distinct entries (that is , when ) there exists a such that for . In other words, the action on the subset of of tuples without repeated entries is transitive. For this is often called double, respectively triple, transitivity. The class of 2-transitive groups (that is, subgroups of a finite symmetric group whose action is 2-transitive) and more generally multiply transitive groups is well-studied in finite group theory.
An action is when the action on tuples without repeated entries in is sharply transitive.
The action of the general linear group of a vector space on the set of non-zero vectors is transitive, but not 2-transitive (similarly for the action of the special linear group if the dimension of is at least 2). The action of the orthogonal group of a Euclidean space is not transitive on nonzero vectors but it is on the unit sphere.
The action is wandering if every has a neighbourhood such that there are only finitely many with .
More generally, a point is called a point of discontinuity for the action of if there is an open subset such that there are only finitely many with . The domain of discontinuity of the action is the set of all points of discontinuity. Equivalently it is the largest -stable open subset such that the action of on is wandering. In a dynamical context this is also called a wandering set.
The action is properly discontinuous if for every Compact space subset there are only finitely many such that . This is strictly stronger than wandering; for instance the action of on given by is wandering and free but not properly discontinuous.
The action by deck transformations of the fundamental group of a locally simply connected space on a universal cover is wandering and free. Such actions can be characterized by the following property: every has a neighbourhood such that for every . Actions with this property are sometimes called freely discontinuous, and the largest subset on which the action is freely discontinuous is then called the free regular set.
An action of a group on a locally compact space is called cocompact if there exists a compact subset such that . For a properly discontinuous action, cocompactness is equivalent to compactness of the quotient space .
The action is said to be if the map defined by is proper map. This means that given compact sets the set of such that is compact. In particular, this is equivalent to proper discontinuity if is a discrete group.
It is said to be locally free if there exists a neighbourhood of such that for all and .
The action is said to be strongly continuous if the orbital map is continuous for every . Contrary to what the name suggests, this is a weaker property than continuity of the action.
If is a Lie group and a differentiable manifold, then the subspace of smooth points for the action is the set of points such that the map is smooth map. There is a well-developed theory of Lie group actions, i.e. action which are smooth on the whole space.
The defining properties of a group guarantee that the set of orbits of (points in) under the action of form a partition of . The associated equivalence relation is defined by saying if and only if there exists a in with . The orbits are then the equivalence classes under this relation; two elements and are equivalent if and only if their orbits are the same, that is, .
The group action is transitive if and only if it has exactly one orbit, that is, if there exists in with . This is the case if and only if for in (given that is non-empty).
The set of all orbits of under the action of is written as (or, less frequently, as ), and is called the of the action. In geometric situations it may be called the , while in algebraic situations it may be called the space of , and written , by contrast with the invariants (fixed points), denoted : the coinvariants are a while the invariants are a . The coinvariant terminology and notation are used particularly in group cohomology and group homology, which use the same superscript/subscript convention.
Every orbit is an invariant subset of on which acts transitively. Conversely, any invariant subset of is a union of orbits. The action of on is transitive if and only if all elements are equivalent, meaning that there is only one orbit.
A -invariant element of is such that for all . The set of all such is denoted and called the -invariants of . When is a G-module, is the zeroth Group cohomology group of with coefficients in , and the higher cohomology groups are the of the functor of -invariants.
Let and be two elements in , and let be a group element such that . Then the two stabilizer groups and are related by .
Proof: by definition, if and only if . Applying to both sides of this equality yields ; that is, .
An opposite inclusion follows similarly by taking and .
The above says that the stabilizers of elements in the same orbit are Conjugacy class to each other. Thus, to each orbit, we can associate a conjugacy class of a subgroup of (that is, the set of all conjugates of the subgroup). Let denote the conjugacy class of . Then the orbit has type if the stabilizer of some/any in belongs to . A maximal orbit type is often called a principal orbit type.
If is finite then the orbit–stabilizer theorem, together with Lagrange's theorem, gives In other words, the length of the orbit of times the order of its stabilizer is the order of the group. In particular that implies that the orbit length is a divisor of the group order.
This result is especially useful since it can be employed for counting arguments (typically in situations where is finite as well).
Fixing a group , the set of formal differences of finite -sets forms a ring called the Burnside ring of , where addition corresponds to disjoint union, and multiplication to Cartesian product.
The composition of two morphisms is again a morphism. If a morphism is bijective, then its inverse is also a morphism. In this case is called an isomorphism, and the two -sets and are called isomorphic; for all practical purposes, isomorphic -sets are indistinguishable.
Some example isomorphisms:
With this notion of morphism, the collection of all -sets forms a category theory; this category is a Grothendieck topos (in fact, assuming a classical metalogic, this topos will even be Boolean).
Instead of actions on sets, we can define actions of groups and monoids on objects of an arbitrary category: start with an object of some category, and then define an action on as a monoid homomorphism into the monoid of endomorphisms of . If has an underlying set, then all definitions and facts stated above can be carried over. For example, if we take the category of vector spaces, we obtain group representations in this fashion.
We can view a group as a category with a single object in which every morphism is Inverse element. A (left) group action is then nothing but a (covariant) functor from to the category of sets, and a group representation is a functor from to the category of vector spaces. A morphism between -sets is then a natural transformation between the group action functors. In analogy, an action of a groupoid is a functor from the groupoid to the category of sets or to some other category.
In addition to continuous actions of topological groups on topological spaces, one also often considers smooth actions of Lie groups on manifold, regular actions of on algebraic varieties, and actions of on schemes. All of these are examples of acting on objects of their respective category.
|
|